Just telling the facts, just giving the minimum details to
an event does not always make for a good story. Actually is seldom makes for a
good story. Case in point, Hester Rumberg’s non-fiction work, Ten Degrees of Reckoning: A True Story of
Survival. In this work Rumberg retells the harrowing events of the Sleavin
family, the tragedy that befell them while they were at sea, and the mother’s
(Judith Sleavin) struggle to survive and reclaim a sense of life. It is a
powerful and gripping story that begs to be told for many reasons. It tells of
gross corporate negligence, of the frustration of the court system on the
national and international level, of one woman’s strength and hope, and of the
beauty that can be found in a family. There are many reasons to tell this story
and many ways that it can be told. In each and every way the truth, the facts,
the basics of the story can be maintained while holding up a nuance of the
narrative. Sadly, I do not feel that Hester Rumberg does the story justice.
Rumberg, a physician by training and a sailor by hobby and
passion does a good job gathering the details, learning as much as she can,
sharing as much of the details and the back story as she can and does a fine
job in this pursuit. Yet in spinning the web, in telling the story, Rumberg
falls short. All the details are there, the facts are present, but the
narrative core is missing making this a mediocre work.
It should be said that Rumberg is a friend of Judith
Sleavin, and someone that Sleavin trusts to tell the story. Rumberg should be applauded for shouldering the mantel of telling her friend’s
tragic story. This is not an easy task. Yet something is missing.
Rumberg is not a writer. She is not a journalist. She is not
someone who has practiced the art of writing, of telling a tale, of finding and
fleshing out the story. True to her training as a radiologist, she looks at the
story and tells what happened, but that does not pull out the story.
One story has many facets. Think of the four different stories of Jesus (Matthew, Mark,
Luke, and John. They are in the later part of the Bible in case you weren’t
sure). These are all working with many of the same facts, many of the same bits
of information and yet all offer slightly different pictures of Jesus. One goes
into great effort to connect the teachings of Jesus with the teachings of Moses
and the Prophets. Another shows how the person and ministry of Jesus is one
that goes beyond the rules and expectations of Judaism to include outsiders.
Another offers a more “spiritual/mystical” view of Jesus’ teachings and ideas
but one that does not diminish Jesus’ humanity. In the Bible we have four
stories of the same person. Overlapping facts. Overlapping details, yet each
one offers a different nuance in the narrative.
This does not make one “true” and another “false,” but is
honest and true to the subjectivity that is going to be present whenever one
begins to tell a story. Even if the story is autobiographical, it will still
have nuance and bias. This is a reality to journalism, to storytelling, and is
important to realize and embrace. The trick, so often, is to decide what your "bias" is going to be, what the angle of the story will be, and then to fully embrace it. That is good storytelling and as long as one holds to the facts it is also "truth-telling."
There is a story to tell in this book, and it is a good and
powerful story. Scratch that. There are many stories to tell, and they can be good
and powerful. What one needs to do is to take a chance, embrace a story, and
then, without apology, tell it.
No comments:
Post a Comment