I’m not a conformist. I don’t like walking with large groups
of people, I don’t like dressing the same as my children, and I don’t like
being told what to do. This is probably why I became a pastor; I did not want
to be a part of Nietzsche’s “herd” so I went for the uber…. (unpack that!).
I’m not a conformist and yet growing up I was fairly
involved with Boy Scouts. This is an organization that screams conformity.
Granted I still did it in my way, but within the confines of the structure of
Troops, Patrols, Uniforms, Leaders, Oaths, and the like. In reflection I see
how much I gained and learned from Scouts and how it was an important part of
shaping who I am today. All this is to say that I am not anti-Scouting.
I think I may even be pro-Scouting.
Two of my children are in Scouts and seem to enjoy it and
more might join (yep, I have a whole gaggle of children waiting to conform to
the norms of society). I haven’t said “no” to any of them, so I guess I am
pro-Scouting. The church where I am serving even sponsors a Cub Scout Pack and
I haven’t created a stink about that, so I guess I really am pro-Scouting. Now,
after reading about the Southern Baptists’ reaction to recent decisions that
the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) made and I think I am going to be even more
pro-Scouting… to a point.
First, I think it is inexcusable to bar anyone from anything
because of his or her sexual orientation.
Second, it is even more inexcusable if it is a child being
excluded. Think about this for a moment. How many children in elementary school
are actually articulating a sense of sexual orientation? From the 1st
to the 4th or 5th grade (and beyond) boys are more
interested in fart jokes, action heroes, sports activities, and electronic
gaming entertainment. Why would anyone ask a 6 or 7-year-old Cub Scout if he is
gay?
With the older kids, on the Boy Scout side, the Onion made the great satirical point about how difficult it is to be a Boy Scout in this
day and age. In actuality, just growing up and trying to figure out who you are
is a difficult thing. If you are struggling with a sense of sexuality and
belonging and are in a very delicate time in your life and then told you aren’t
welcome, what with that do to a young man’s psyche? Unless the Boy Scouts are
advocating sexual activity in their meetings or offering a “sex” merit badge,
one’s sexual orientation should not matter.
(I also think the ban on gay leaders is stupid because it is
sending mixed messages, saying that the BSA organization is trying to please
everyone, but that is for another time.)
All that said, I’m glad the BSA reversed its stance on
exclusion, but that is not what I’m writing about. I recently read that a
leader from the Southern Baptists is urging churches to stay connected with the
Boy Scouts (good) so that they could help all of the gay Scouts learn how to
live morally “straight” lives (bad). Read between the lines and you will see
that A.J. Smith, head of the Association of Baptists for Scouting is
encouraging churches to have a) an undue influence over Troops/Packs that they
may sponsor, and b) work to make any gay scouts in those groups feel as if they
do not belong.
Think about this. The Boy Scouts is a non-sectarian group
when it comes to religion. Churches sponsor troops as a part of a service to
the community. It is very likely that people of faiths other than Christian are
a part of those groups (in fact I know that we have many Jewish and even a
Hindu family in the Pack my church sponsors). If a church is going to get
involved to make sure the scouts are leading a “morally straight” life, then
why not make it a morally straight life that is in accordance to Christianity,
or to a Protestant understanding of Christianity, or to a Baptist
understanding, or to a Southern Baptist understanding. Now we are excluding a
whole mess of people.
If a church is involved to make sure that everyone is having
sex with the “right” person this is a thinly veiled way to tell any boy or
young man who is struggling with a sense of identity and sexuality that he is
wrong, different, and not accepted. Our society is already over-infused with
images and messages of what is “right” and what is “wrong” (that is starting to
slowly change); the message does not need to be reinforced. A.J. Smith states
that the resolution of the BSA deals only with sexual orientation and not
behavior. Smith is taking that to say, “you are welcome as long as you conform
to the life we think you should live... even if that makes you feel wrong.”
Like I said, I am not a conformist.
I support the Boy Scouts and will support them more when
they let go of the stupid anti-gay leader rule (I am sure there is a technical
name for that). I support them because it gives boys and young men another
place to try to learn what it means to be a leader in this society among many
other values. It is not a religious institution but a civic one. The Southern
Baptists are wrong on this, even with A.J. Smith’s compromised reading of the
situation. Let the boys be boys. Let them make their fart jokes, let them be
lewd at times, and let them have their fun. And if in the midst of it a
conversation about sexuality emerges (hopefully with the older boys and not the
younger), let the boys learn how to listen, how to try to understand, and how
to be supportive of each other. I think that is one of the basic ideals of
Scouting. I’m pretty sure exclusion is not in the Scout Oath or Law, but it has
been a while and I was never good at conforming to rote statements of faith or fidelity.
3 comments:
I couldn't agree more, Jonathan, though I was never a Boy Scout -- nor even a Girl Scout, which would have been possible (I was a rural kid, and belonged to the 4-H). In fact, the GSA has been way ahead of the BSA as far as inclusivity is concerned.
Thanks for the comment Lois - there must be something in the cookies that help the GSA stay so far ahead
Hadn't thought of that, Jonathan -- you might just have something there... btw I'll be back at EBC next Sunday, subbing for Kathy D.
Post a Comment