I’m a little freaked out with the rhetoric I am hearing from
politicians in Israel and here in the United States. I never knew people could
get so anxious as to immediately jump to the consideration of force, all over
the cost of olive oil!
Actually it is over the potential of Iran having nuclear weapons.
I understand some of the arguments that people are making:
They are
crazy!
They hate
us (both Israel and the US)!
They are
crazy!
They still
hate us!
They are
crazy!
There may be more arguments and perhaps arguments that are a
little more nuanced, but these are the ones that I hear the most. It isn’t just
the rhetoric of doom that freaks me out but the militaristic tone and the idea
that violence is a viable option that scares me. We all know that the
possibility of war is in the back of everyone’s minds, but the rhetoric I have
heard brings such a possibility to the front. This freaks me out.
This freaks me out for many reasons, the least bit being
anti war (yup, I’m a yellow-belly, tree-hugging, sandal-wearing pacifist). One
notion that sticks out in my mind is the military response to the potential of
creating nuclear weapons. Some are suggesting that we attack Iran because they
have the potential to create weapons grade uranium which could lead to the
production of uranium weapons. The crime is in the potential of committing a
crime. See, it is not good to have potential.
Putting aside that we attacked Iraq for similar reasons
(they may have WMDs, so we better hit them before they hit us), this mentality
is very dangerous and pessimistic.
I wonder if it is connected in part to the idea of original
sin. This is an idea that states people are born sinful and thus should be
condemned to hell before they even do anything, because the potential to sin is
there and because they are saddled with sin. We need to assume the worst of people
because sin will pull them down again and again.
I like to believe that we are born a blank slate, a tabula
rasa, and that we have the potential to make right and wrong decisions. Others,
the original sin folks, seem to assume that we will always make the wrong
decisions.
I’m well aware that such a doctrine is not on the minds of
our Israeli counterparts, but I do believe it has become such a part of common
Christian thought that it is difficult to imagine someone making the right
decision. We are horrible, sinful, dirty, broken, worthless, evil, messy,
pathetic creatures and will never get it right. How’s your self-esteem now?
I’m not suggesting that we assume people in Iran, or
elsewhere, will always make the “right” decision or that we always give people
the benefit of the doubt. Sometimes trust is broken. What I am suggesting is
that we consider our theological anthropology, i.e. our idea of what it means
to be human, and consider how such a view effects the way we consider and treat
each other.
So to improve your friendships, your work relationships,
your marriage, etc., eschew original sin and embrace the goodness in which we
are created.
4 comments:
Heavy early morning thoughts TS, I make it a policy never to chew on original sin before 12:00PM otherwise certain family and friends are apt to do an "intervention" with me. Because i have had to teach a course where we used the pinkman's book on human nature I recommend it, not because I agree with him, rather he must be accounted for in any discussion of blank slate dialogue - "The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature" by Steven Pinker. CIO but not till the sun is high.
Yep
Nice post, and I'm with you on the folly of pre-emtive violence.
But why stop at original sin (Pelagius was robbed!) - you could have upped the ante even more by using it as a chance to talk about the psychological effects of the doctrine of predestination! :-)
Enjoying the blog (and looking forward to checking out the podcasts),
fr anthony
predestination leads us down a theological rabbit trail that I am afraid I'll never be able to find my way out of!
Post a Comment