“If this weapon were to ever get
into the wrong hands it could be destruction for us all.”
I love that line. It is one of
those lines that you wait to hear whenever you are watching an action,
adventure, spy, aliens, kind of move. It is a line that sets up the conflict
and the importance of the movie. It is most often a forced and contrived line
and I love it when I hear it. I have a dream that in one movie a character
holds up something and the camera zooms in. You see the character holding
nothing less than the Holy Bible hear him or her say “if this ends up in the
wrong hands it could be the end for us all!”
The point is that the Bible can be
a very dangerous book. It can be seen by many as a dangerous weapon that in the
wrong hands can be destructive to the reader and to many others as history has
demonstrated multiple times.
The Bible is at best a tricky book
to read. It has been the source of inspiration of bigotry, prejudice, war,
greed, racism, oppression, and poor decorating tastes. It is a book that has
been used to push segregation, capitalism (for better or worse), socialism
(again for better or worse), monarchism, patriarchies, and being just plain
mean; known by scholars as “meanism or jerkism.” In the wrong hands, read the
wrong way, the Bible can be a book that can lead to sorrow and suffering. In
the wrong hands the Bible can be a dangerous book.
Yet it also has the potential to
be a powerful book of life, hope, and freedom. Just as many who have used the
Scriptures to justify so much pain and sorrow, many more have found
justification a foundation for helping people in need, people who are hurting,
and people who are at risk of being forgotten. The Bible need not be a negative
book.
A large part of the challenge and
the difficulty is in how we read the Bible. Many of the negative, dangerous,
and oppressive interpretations of scripture comes out of a literal reading of
the text, and usually it is the King James Version of the text that is being
read in that hyper-literalist way (hooray for the critical-literal method gone
awry!). In my humble opinion (hah!), I believe this is a close-minded way of
approaching the Bible that is not open to the continued movement of the Holy
Spirit. Peter Gomes writes in his work TheGood Book that the Bible is a living, dynamic, alive work pulling us into a
faith that has offered life and hope and liberation to multitudes. The Baptist
preacher and scholar Ralph Elliot writes that the word of God is a witness to
faith. The Bible is a witness to a people encountering and trying to understand
their relationship with God. It is alive, dynamic, and needs to be read with an
ear for how God is continuing to speak.
I am not saying there is one right
way to read the Bible (but there are definitely wrong ways). It is a complex
text that cannot be read with a monolithic lens and each person needs to
discern they ways to read the Bible that leads them to engage the divine
through the text. What I am saying is that the Bible should not be read alone.
It is when someone reads the Bible alone that one often comes to dangerous and
harmful interpretations. The community can serve as a corrective, as a guide,
and as a support to one who is listening for God’s eternal word. That is why we
need a faith community and why we all should be going to church. Yup, you
should feel a little guilty right now, because outside of the church you do not
have the witness of others to lead upon as you strive to engage and understand
this complex and often confusing book. Inside a church it is too dark to read
(thanks Groucho Marx).
The Bible need not and should not
be a weapon. It can and should be a guide, a star, a testimony, and a comfort.
But in the wrong hands, read in the wrong way it can be damaging to many. In
closing, I would like to offer nine “thesis” of reading the Bible from The Art of Reading Scripture edited by
Ellen Davis and Richard B. Hays:
1.
The Bible tells God’s story of creating,
judging, and saving the world
2.
The Bible is a coherent dramatic narrative
3.
The Bible requires engagement with the entire
narrative
4.
To read the Bible on must use multiple, complex
senses just as scripture reflects multiple, complex senses
5.
The Gospels narrate the truth about Jesus
6.
The Bible invites and presupposes participation
in the community/church
7.
The “Saints” of the church (the leaders and
pillars of the community) provide guidance in interpretation
8.
Christians need to read the Bible in dialogue
with diverse people outside the church
9.
The Bible calls us to ongoing discernment and a
fresh reading again and again in light of the Holy Spirit’s work in the world
I should say that this is not a quoted list, but paraphrased
– you get the idea. In case you don’t get the idea, the idea is that the Bible
something that pulls us into a faith that is not static, but moving and pulling
us to a deeper relationship with God. Read your Bible, but only with others and
always open to the movement of God’s inspiration through the Holy Spirit. And
remember this simple rule: if your
interpretation leads you exclude, hurt, or dismiss others than maybe it is a
misguided interpretation.
5 comments:
This is a very nice article. I definitely agree that the Bible can be dangerous in the wrong hands. It has become clear as day to me that any interpretation that is exclusive is getting the whole point point wrong. As you point out, history is very clear about this. I am going to share this in a group I created. Btw, I really liked the Gomes book. Thanks for sharing.
You know, I think the last time I commented here I was struck by how two successive posts really sort of fit together nicely. Yes, the Bible is--or can be--a very dangerous book. And that danger is increased sevenfold (or more) when it becomes a political tool, or is used by politicians to promote a particular view.
Now, this is no less true of the Quran, or Das Kaptital, or Atlas Shrugged. We should all be saved from politicians who think they can create an ideal society if only we follow the precepts of this book or another. In fact, I had a history prof who hypothesized that the worst evils were perpetrated by people who (possibly)sincerely thought they were bringing about the betterment of society.
The point is, ideas are dangerous things. And the best place to find ideas is in books. I think religion and politics are two areas that should be kept separate. I would ask some of the proponents of school prayer how they would feel if the prayers were directed to Vishnu, or Allah. I don't mean to pick on anyone person or group; it's just that in these United States the advocates for the commingling of religion and politics are Christians.
John Huss - thanks for your comments as always. I think you are right that all ideas can be dangerous and yet at the same time can be redemptive (depending on the idea). We could just stop reading books, but I don't think that will happen. We could just stop thinking, but I don't think that will happen either. There is a balance that we have to strive to achieve.
I was puzzled by comments about separating politics and theology. Just as Jesus did? I think not. Jesus single-minded devotion permeated every fiber of His being and he spoke & acted in accordance with His principles whether He was in the synagogue or in the Marketplace. This (common) Machiavellian, double-minded view of our Lord is MORE dangerous to the purity that Christ modeled for us.
Post a Comment