You can’t judge a book by its cover. There is nothing like
the classic, trite sayings that roll off the tongue so easily. It allows us to
break into a depth of wisdom without having to do any real work. We can even say,
“you can’t judge a book…” and not even finish the phrase and still look smug as
if we have just tapped into a profound well of knowledge. This is good because
after all, “A stich in time…”
I have been thinking about the book judging industry as I
have been reading Truman Capote’s happy, fun book In Cold Blood. This is my first time reading it; I have not yet
finished the book but I am struck with the detail that Capote puts into the
work. He has gotten to know the people, the Clutter family, the detectives
involved with the case, the town, and perhaps most notably, the murders. I have
been pleasantly surprised at the depth and listening that clearly went into
this work.
It seems that Capote is trying to offer a picture of
everyone involved, trying to tell the story at great depth and trying to avoid
large brush strokes. As a reader I am pulled to have a kind of affinity towards
the killers learning their story and at the same time horror at their crime.
Capote is not asking the reader to forgive the murders (at least I don’t think
so… I have not yet finished the book), but is asking the readers to understand.
This morning, lying in Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center is Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the young man suspected, along with his now
deceased brother Tamerlan Tsarnaev, of perpetrating the bombings of the Boston
Marathon. Already a number of theories are flying about. Already people are
jumping to conclusions, judging, speculating, and assuming things about them.
Some believe that the Tsarnaev brothers have had contact with a radical Islamic
group. Others believe that the Chechen roots of the family have something to do
with it. I am sure that there are even those who look at the Tsarnaev brothers
and do not see them as Caucasian, but rather as a darker skin ethnicity and
play the race card.
A lot of people are seeing what they want to see, believing
what they want to believe, and are judging the book by the cover.
I am not suggesting that acts of terrorism should be
explained away and forgiven. I am suggesting that we hold off our judgments
because (1) the brothers are suspects and thus presumed innocent until proven
guilty and (2) we cannot read minds (at least most of us can’t read minds… heh,
heh)
I would love it if each person could sit down with Dzhokhar
and have a good conversation without judgment, but that is unrealistic. I hope
a journalist will have the opportunity to tell Dzhokhar’s story so the rest of the world will have an opportunity
to understand and to have some kind of relationship with him.
This is what we need to do; we need to enter into a
relationship, listen, ask questions, learn, and share. Unfortunately that is
not possible to on such a massive scale. Again, I look to the world of
journalism and hope and pray the New York Post has nothing to do with this
individual. Regardless, we cannot judge the book by the cover. We do not know
the whys. Before calling for gruesome executions, condemning someone to hell,
cursing a presumed faith tradition, attacking the family, attacking the
ethnicity, or doing anything else that is a part of the mob mentality code of
ethics (there is a oxymoron), we need to try to understand. If Dzhokhar is
guilty Justice still needs to happen, but there is a difference between justice
and blind rage. Compassion is essential and compassion comes out of relationships
and understanding. That is a part of what makes us human and helps us to rise
above such events of tragedy.
No comments:
Post a Comment